APPROACH

VFX Shot Integrity & Evaluation
Not every shot needs to be fixed.
Some need to be protected.
Many usable shots are compromised in subtle ways — unwanted elements, visual distractions, continuity issues, or technical inconsistencies discovered too late to reshoot. The question is not whether a shot can be altered, but whether intervention serves the original intent without drawing attention to itself.
My approach begins with evaluation before execution.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Understanding Shot Intent
Every shot has a purpose. Performance, pacing, continuity, atmosphere — or simply getting the audience from one moment to the next.
Before any work begins, I identify what the shot is meant to communicate and what must remain untouched. This establishes a clear boundary between what is negotiable and what is not.
If the intent is unclear, the shot is not ready to be altered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identifying Compromise
A compromised shot is not an unusable shot.
Compromise can take many forms:
  •  Unintended objects or visual distractions
  •  Reflections, rigs, or environmental intrusions
  •  Grain or texture inconsistencies
  •  Exposure or continuity issues discovered late in post
The key question is not what can be fixed, but what interferes with the shot’s intent. Anything that does not disrupt intent may not require intervention.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighing the Risk of Intervention
Every adjustment carries risk.
Intervening too aggressively can introduce artifacts, alter motion, flatten texture, or subtly pull attention away from performance. Leaving a shot untouched can sometimes preserve authenticity better than attempting a “perfect” fix.
This stage is where restraint matters most.
I weigh the benefit of intervention against the risk of breaking realism, continuity, or emotional credibility.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recommended Actions
Each shot leads to one of four outcomes:
No Intervention
The issue does not meaningfully impact the shot and is best left untouched.
Minimal Cleanup
Small, minor fixes that remove distractions without altering the shot’s integrity.

Targeted VFX Cleanup
Carefully controlled work where compromise clearly disrupts intent and realism can be preserved.

This may include:
  •  Removing obstructive elements
  •  Stabilizing or reconstructing damaged areas of the frame
  •  Extending environments through digital set extensions or matte painting when               physical limitations prevent the shot from communicating its intended scale or 
     context
All interventions are guided by continuity, lighting, perspective, and the original photographic intent of the shot. Extensions are applied only when they support what was already suggested in-camera, not to redesign or embellish the scene.
If extending the environment introduces more artifice than clarity, the shot is left as-is or flagged as an Ethical Stop.
Ethical Stop
When intervention would cause more harm than benefit, I advise against altering the shot.
Saying no is sometimes the most responsible creative decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protecting the Cut
My role is not simply to clean up images.
It is to protect the integrity of the shot within the context of the edit.
That means knowing when to act — and when not to.
This approach prioritizes judgment, restraint, and respect for the original intent of the work, ensuring that any intervention supports the story rather than calling attention to itself.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How This Works in Practice
Every project begins with:
  •  A clear understanding of shot intent
  •  An honest evaluation of compromise
  •  A discussion of risk and restraint
From there, only the necessary work is done — no more, no less.